Tabletop exercises, red/blue team simulations, and crisis scenarios measure response capacity; we expose weak points before a real crisis does.
The critical topics this service addresses and the outcome we deliver in each.
With tabletop exercises, red/blue team simulations and crisis scenario drills we measure response capacity and make weak points visible before a crisis occurs.
We measure teams' reflex time with MTTD, MTTR, decision time and communication effectiveness metrics, and track improvement through periodic exercises.
We design exercises aligned with sector regulatory requirements (BDDK, SPK, KVKK); the final compliance assessment is left to the auditor and legal counsel.
We assign prioritised action items to Jira/Azure DevOps and track them with owners and due dates over 90 days.
How we phase the service across delivery, governance, and connected service pillars.
Scenario design: we craft the exercise with scenarios specific to the organisation's sector and risk profile (ransomware, DDoS, insider threat, supply chain) and prepare the participant briefing pack.
Exercise execution: in tabletop, functional and full-scale formats we accelerate the learning loop with a purple-team approach that runs attack and defence teams together.
Assessment and follow-up: against NIST CSF, MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 22301 references we produce a gap matrix, management summary and a 90-day improvement action plan, and track progress.
Illustrative surfaces where this service is commonly activated.
Organisations with a written plan that have never measured their reaction in a real crisis.
Teams that want IT, legal, communications, HR and senior leadership to work in a coordinated way during a crisis.
Organisations that want to build exercise and action-plan evidence for BDDK, SPK or KVKK audits.
This service's depth on sector-specific technical and compliance topics.
We design tabletop, functional and full-scale exercises with ransomware, DDoS, insider threat and supply chain scenarios from a library of 20+ sector templates.
We run IT, security, legal, communications and senior leadership together in purple-team sessions, turning theoretical knowledge into practical experience.
With a gap matrix, action plan and management summary we provide an evidence file for ISO 22301 and SOC 2 Type II processes; the certification decision is left to the auditor.
Crisis plans that exist only on paper provide a false sense of security — the real test of organizational resilience is how people actually behave under pressure, not how procedures read in calm conditions. Cyber Resilience Testing exposes the gaps between documented procedures and operational reality through structured tabletop exercises, red team simulations, and full crisis drills. Organizations discover critical coordination failures, communication breakdowns, and decision-making bottlenecks before a real incident occurs, when the cost of failure is measured in learning rather than operational damage.
Identify an average of 8-12 critical procedural gaps per exercise that would have caused real-incident failures
Make risk and response indicators visible through measured controls, rehearsed playbooks, and evidence review
Satisfy regulatory resilience testing mandates from BDDK, CMB, and BRSA supervisory frameworks
Resilience testing engagements are structured around a four-phase methodology: design, conduct, evaluate, and improve. The design phase develops realistic scenarios tailored to your industry threat landscape and current security posture. During conduct, our facilitators guide participants through the scenario in real time, injecting new injects to simulate evolving crisis conditions. The evaluate phase produces a detailed after-action report, and the improve phase translates findings into updated plans and a remediation roadmap.
Test scenarios drawn from real-world incidents affecting your sector in the past 24 months
Ensure cross-functional alignment between IT, legal, and communications teams before a real crisis
Meet BRSA Operational Resilience Circular requirements for documented testing evidence
Every resilience testing engagement concludes with a comprehensive after-action report (AAR) that documents exercise observations, identifies gaps against expected performance, and provides a prioritized improvement roadmap with owners and target completion dates. The AAR is structured for dual use — as an internal improvement tool and as regulatory evidence of tested resilience capability. Exercise materials including scenario packs are retained for use in future self-conducted exercises.
Produce board-ready resilience testing evidence reducing governance reporting preparation time
Enable internal teams to self-conduct quarterly exercises using delivered materials without external facilitation
Turn the outcome into a measurable target with baseline, owner, and review cadence
A tabletop exercise is a facilitated discussion where participants walk through their response to a hypothetical scenario at a conference table — it tests decision-making, coordination, and communication without technical execution. A red team exercise involves actual attack simulation by a dedicated adversarial team, testing both the technical security controls and the organizational response to detected (and sometimes undetected) attack activity.
Timeline is confirmed during discovery based on scope, integration complexity, current maturity, and acceptance criteria. The project plan is tied to approved scope and dependencies.
Strongly recommended. Many critical decisions during a real incident — breach notification timing, regulatory contact sequencing, public statement approval — require legal input. Including legal counsel in exercises reveals whether legal review processes are realistically fast enough and whether counsel is fully briefed on the organization's systems and regulatory obligations.
Yes. We design regulatory-specific scenario modules for KVKK breach notification (72-hour VERBIS process), BDDK incident reporting, BRSA operational resilience, and EU NIS2 requirements. These modules walk participants through the exact regulatory steps under simulated time pressure, ensuring the process is tested before it is needed for real.
We use a structured maturity scoring framework across five dimensions: detection speed, containment effectiveness, communication quality, decision-making clarity, and regulatory compliance adherence. Each exercise cycle produces scores against these dimensions, enabling direct comparison and demonstrable improvement year over year — both for internal governance and for regulatory evidence.
Yes, with your authorization. Many cyber insurers now ask for resilience testing evidence as part of policy renewal and premium adjustment processes. Our AAR format includes an insurer-facing summary section that documents tested capabilities, identified gaps, and remediation commitments — information that underwriters use to assess risk quality.
This short form routes your request to the right support team. We clarify context first, then define the safe sharing method.
Privacy-aware first contact; safe sharing flow when needed; no sales pressure.
